B2B software buyers don’t sit around asking, “Which vendor should we pick today?” First, they dig into the thornier stuff. Can we build this ourselves or buy something that’s already out there? Should we really swap out what we’ve got? People in buying groups wrestle with these real comparisons all the time. Most comparison content out there ignores these moments.
Why does this happen? Most “X vs. Y” content treats buying like picking between two laptops. But there’s more than checking off a features list. People are making choices that could help or hurt their careers. Every step balances technical risk, shaking up workflows, and the internal politics that come with it. If your content skips over “should we build or keep what we have?” it leaves people with even more questions.
This guide explains how to make Build vs. Buy vs. Switch comparison content that helps, not hinders. Along the way, see when people consider each route, what they want to know before making a move, and how to lay out the details so uncertainty shrinks instead of grows.
Why People Compare Build, Buy, and Switch—Not Just Vendors
The journey doesn’t start with your software. At the beginning, someone always asks, “Do we need to pay for this at all?”
What usually happens? Someone mentions the idea of building something in-house. The engineering team seems free, the project looks unique, and nobody’s eager to rely on a vendor. Then reality hits—twice the timeline, new maintenance headaches, and sidelined projects. Only then do teams warm to the idea of buying.
But buying brings fresh hurdles. Most buying groups need buy-in from four or more people. And someone usually already set up a tool that kind of does the job. So you don’t just weigh features, you ask if switching is worth the pain—migrations, downtime, retraining, and all that comes with it.
Most vendor comparison pages miss these layers. They start with the idea that someone has decided to switch. So the content counts features for Option A and B but skips over why someone would leave Option C (what’s already installed) or Option D (something you could build). But these are the toughest parts of the decision.
If comparison content skips over this context, it slows everything down. Teams get stuck re-explaining the same “build or switch?” questions in sales calls. People handle most of the purchase process before they ever talk to a vendor. Those nagging questions need good answers well before the first product demo.
Useful comparison content gets the real story. Picking your tool means choosing not to stay put and not to build. That’s the actual decision people face.
When People Seriously Think About Building
The “Let’s just build it” suggestion pops up early. Someone points out open engineering bandwidth and a need that looks custom, so the company considers building instead of buying and paying ongoing costs. Sounds doable—until the actual workload comes into view.
People usually lean toward building when:
- They have workflows that don’t match typical software tools
- Engineering teams could take it on
- The group worries about giving up control or their data
These points all make sense in context. Sometimes, building does fit.
What gets missed most? The hidden cost. Custom development costs five to ten times more than teams expect when you count maintenance, tech debt, and distractions from core work. That one “simple” feature can eat years of developer time.
About forty percent of developer time disappears into technical debt, not building new tools. Teams have to invest in security, compliance, scaling, and then keep those systems running. The hours spent on DIY projects can’t go to the main product.
The biggest loss is opportunity cost. Over five years, custom builds reach three to five million dollars and take anywhere from a year to three. Out-of-the-box solutions cost under a million and launch in three to six months. Most custom builds don’t even meet the original requirements.
Great comparison content brings this all into focus in a straightforward way, not by scaring people away from building. Instead, show clear timelines, list out the true costs, and point out when building might really make sense. Tools like decision trees or charts can do a better job than a mountain of fine print. The aim is to help people choose wisely, not make them anxious.
Buying Software: What People Want to Know
Checklists of product features run out of steam quickly. Everyone expects vendors to boast about features. What really helps people is clarity on things like risk, the effort to get up and running, and what daily life with the tool will be like.
Once groups get close to picking, they care most about a few key things:
- How quickly the new tool delivers results
- What the real price tag is—upfront and ongoing
- How tough it is to fit with what they already use
- How much change they’ll need to navigate
Over half of B2B buyers want a return on investment in three months, so rollouts drag if implementation takes too long.
Total cost covers more than the sticker price. There’s installation, support, training, and the headache of integrating everything. The ease or pain of blending the new tool with old systems can make or break a decision. Nobody wants to imagine months spent fixing APIs.
Change management is another big deal. People ask, “Will this take endless retraining?” “Will my team use it or just ignore it?” “What’s going to change during the switch?” These are the questions standing between a product and strong adoption.
Clear editorial framing does more for trust than features. Outlining what works best for different teams helps people know if they’re a match. For example:
- “Fits teams with dedicated operations and complex processes.”
- “Priced for companies set to invest, so not ideal for startups running lean.”
Here’s the heart of it: Most people don’t want “the best tool.” They want the least risky, most reasonable way forward. Every big-buy moment is a step in someone’s career. The key thing on everyone’s mind? Will this make me look good, help me hit my goals, and move ahead—or could it backfire? Comparison content should talk to those stakes, not just list specs.
Switching Vendors: Where Comparisons Pages Matter Most
Switching gives people the most pause. It’s a huge moment for any team. Many love what they see in a new product, but then freeze up, picturing all the ways a migration might go sideways. The risks feel big and the work ahead looks uncertain.
The biggest pain points:
- Worries over data migration—will everything move over safely?
- The fear of downtime and lost productivity
- The retraining required for everyone
- The disruption to how a team works day to day
Switching vendors often costs hundreds of thousands to over a million dollars, just to make the leap. That ignores the intangibles.
Bringing over data always sounds simpler than it is. Over half of existing applications can’t even use the new data without fixes. Migration can run up the bill by nearly half and drag timelines out by the same margin, especially if people try to move everything.
The even bigger worry is political fallout. Someone rallied for the old tool. Changing course means admitting that choice fell short. Buying groups don’t want to look fickle or seem like they wasted money.
Helpful comparison content puts concrete numbers on switching:
- Timelines people can expect
- Step-by-step switching checklists
- Specific advice for those coming from major legacy tools
Stories help here. A testimonial about a team that made the switch, got set up, and moved forward builds a lot more confidence than general praise. People want to know it’s survivable.
Agencies can really help here. When you’re deep in your own product, it’s tough to talk about the tough stuff that comes with changing over from an old tool. A third-party view can lay out the headaches honestly, but still make the case that change pays off. It isn’t about pretending switching is painless but showing that it’s possible and manageable.
Structuring Build vs. Buy vs. Switch Content
Clear structure gets more people reading. People need to find their own scenario quickly and get answers that fit. Nobody enjoys a giant wall of text.
Start out with “Who should care about this decision?” This could be roles, size of company, or the problem you face. When people see themselves described, it shows you get where they’re coming from.
Next up, a simple Build vs. Buy vs. Switch comparison table. Put the basics side by side:
- Timelines
- Cost estimates
- Risks
- Best fit scenarios
- Common slip-ups
It’s quicker than sifting through paragraphs.
Deep dives come after. For each path, give:
- Key benefits
- Drawbacks
- Risks
- Actual numbers when possible—days, months, cost, or odds of failure
Skip the fluffy talk. “This project takes three months if you dedicate a project manager” is better than “Our process is seamless.”
Add in examples for clarity. “If you have a small team and tight launch date, buying could be better. If you’re developing core IP with lots of runway, think about building. If you use Tool X now and can’t stand these specific limits, here’s what switching looks like.” Name the real details.
Wrap up with what comes next. Non-pushy actions help people instead of pushing them out the door. Try “Download our checklist,” “Request a side-by-side demo,” or “Talk to a team that switched.” Simple, low-pressure options keep things moving.
Design matters here. Give the basics first, then let people dig deeper if they want more. Show you’re neutral—sometimes building or sticking with what you have makes sense. Brands who support decisions cut out noise, not add to it.
Why This Content Should Support Buying Decisions
Build vs. Buy vs. Switch content isn’t for early research. It’s there when people are ready to nail down a decision.
This approach helps sales teams answer tough calls. It helps IT teams prep for security and migration. It helps leaders show decision makers why something’s the right move.
Buying committees make almost half of all software calls—more in big companies. Everyone from IT to finance to senior leaders has questions. Content with clear information gives each person backing for their own decision.
The big win is that uncertainty drops without generating fake urgency. People crave no-pressure, self-guided experiences, but without good resources they second-guess themselves. Strong content lets people do their own homework and still choose with confidence.
Comparison content often gets used for internal buy-in. A breakdown might land in the CFO’s inbox or help the implementation team prep. A big part of the final call comes down to content alone. Sometimes, your resource is the decider between action and analysis paralysis.
What Trips Up Brands with Build vs. Buy Content
The biggest stumble? Turning an “objective” guide into a thinly-veiled pitch. People sense it instantly. If your page says building is hopeless and buying from you is flawless, trust breaks down.
Another pitfall is skipping the switching scenario. Most people aren’t starting from a blank slate—they’re changing from something else. If you don’t talk about migration, you leave them hanging.
Crafting for search engines instead of real conversation is another trap. Sure, keywords matter. But don’t fill your guide with phrases like “build vs buy [category].” Shallow, keyword-stuffed writing doesn’t help anyone decide.
One-off campaign pieces waste good ideas. This isn’t a quick blog to check off. Real comparison content sticks around and needs updates as products and technology shift. Nearly half of B2B marketers struggle to connect content and sales. If your guide sits in a silo, it’s not doing the job.
Where Agencies Add Value in Build vs. Buy Comparison Content
Writing from the inside makes it hard to stay neutral. You know your own product’s high points and naturally want it to win. But that makes it tricky to give honest credit to building or switching as solid options.
A fresh view can fix this. Experienced agencies talk to real buyers, find out what drives their decisions, and translate those real-world stories into content that makes sense. Making the buying process smoother matters. Agencies can bring the discipline to do this right.
Story-driven agencies know how to fit interviews and complex data into guides that people use. They can create clear visuals, answer questions for more than one type of decision-maker, and tie into what your sales team actually needs day after day.
This sits at the crossroads of strategy and product know-how. It’s about balancing enough familiarity to be precise and enough distance to stay honest about tradeoffs. The content works for both search engines and real people. It becomes both a marketing resource and a sales tool with staying power.
At Column Five we use story-led content to give people the details they need to choose wisely. Story Scan finds what’s truly different about what you offer and turns it into comparison content people trust. The focus stays on content that supports decision-making and drives better outcomes across the whole customer journey.
What Makes Good Comparison Content Stand Out
Trustworthy comparison content has clear markers. It spells out the tradeoffs so people make informed choices. Helpful “not for you if…” notes steer the wrong fit away and save everyone time. Decision support always comes before persuasion.
Effective content does more than market. Sales teams can send it to prospects without worry. Product and engineering teams can use it to plan for the future. Even customer support can share it to set up new teams for a smooth start.
Every detail should cut through friction and make it easier to move forward. Look for ways to help people decide faster, with less hassle. Add clear next steps, downloads, and easy contact links—don’t bury actions behind forms or red tape.
The right structure also helps AI tools surface your resource when someone asks, “Should I build, buy, or switch?” AI shows decision content more as buyers use tools like Google’s AI Overviews. More buyers turn to AI for big decisions every year. Explicit Build vs. Buy vs. Switch content is now a must-have.
The best guides never read like a marketing pitch. They feel like the advice you’d give a friend considering a big step. They keep things readable, honest, and genuinely helpful from start to finish.
If you’re ready to give people a comparison page that answers the real questions (and does it in a way that supports good decisions at every turn), talk to us. We help SaaS companies show up where it matters—with comparison content that makes picking the right solution a little easier for everyone involved.
Let's upgrade your marketing game
Get fresh tips, how-tos, and expert marketing advice every week. (15,000 people already are.)
